EN KURALLARı OF C# ILIST KULLANıMı

En Kuralları Of C# IList Kullanımı

En Kuralları Of C# IList Kullanımı

Blog Article

Note that, if your API is only going to be used in foreach loops, etc, then you might want to consider just exposing IEnumerable instead.

From this it follows that your method implementation birey represent its local variables however you wish. The implementation details are hamiş exposed. Leaving you free to change your code to something better without affecting the people calling your code.

lomaxxlomaxx 115k5858 gold badges146146 silver badges180180 bronze badges 1 Why would you return an IList in the first place? From a WCF service?

A List object allows you to create a list, add things to it, remove it, update it, index into it and etc. List is used whenever you just want a generic list where you specify object type in it and that's it.

ToList first? How about returning it? I don't understand what you mean by "method will survive" when using vars? I know it will be a bit more work but won't you just have to change that to the new type bey well? So maybe IList to IList?

then, say, if you had C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız an array and wished to print their type names to the console, you would first have to create a new List and fill it with your types.

 

Then when you need "add" or "sort" then use Collection if need C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır more then use List. So my hard rule would be: START always with IENumarable and if you need more then extend...

In most cases, if you are using a List and you think you could use a narrower interface C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor instead - why not IEnumerable? This is often a better fit if you don't need to add items. If you need to C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor add to the collection, use the concrete type, List.

Modülerlik: Yazılı sınavm projelerinde modüler bir yaklaşım sunarak kod yenidenını azaltır ve hizmetı kolaylaştırır.

This argument only works if you write your own implementation of IList from sratch (or at least without inheriting List)

In this case you could pass in C# IList Kullanımı any class which implements the IList interface. If you used List instead, only a List instance could be passed in.

So typically, your methods should accept and return interfaces for collections. This leaves your own implementation and your callers room to decide on the actual implementation as required.

ahead of time. Veri-binding is a classic example here; a DataSource property usually checks for IList (and IListSource, typically) and then looks at the objects to see what properties are available. It gönül't use generics in this case.

Report this page